57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
21
5
4
3
4
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
11.9
4.8
3.3
1.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2024
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
165
158
40
23
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen