57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4Premium
PirelliPirelli

P ZERO PZ4

9.1
R13 – R23
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
3
13
3
1
14
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.7
4.3
3.3
1.0
5.5
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
34
123
40
64
706

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich