57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Fulda EcoControl HP2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
8
4
18
6
4
3
4
Optimale Position
#12
#4
#3
#1
#3
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
12.8
12.0
6.1
4.7
3.3
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
30
111
47
146
40
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen