57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
21
10
18
3
3
3
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
11.9
6.0
6.1
3.3
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
164
104
47
40
126
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich