56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
21
3
5
18
3
26
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
11.9
3.3
2.2
6.1
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
164
40
63
47
34
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich