57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
21
18
14
10
4
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
11.9
6.1
6.3
6.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2024
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
165
47
532
109
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen