56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
13
3
18
1
5
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.7
4.3
3.3
6.1
1.0
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2025
2026
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
34
123
40
47
64
63

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich