57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
18
4
1
5
5
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.7
6.1
3.3
1.0
2.2
4.8
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
36
47
40
66
63
158

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen