56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.4
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
2
18
4
3
3
3
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#3
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
1.0
6.1
12.0
3.3
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2025
2024
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
23
47
111
40
126
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich