57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
36
4
18
3
14
5
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.1
12.0
6.1
3.3
5.5
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
296
111
47
40
706
63

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich