57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Anzahl der Tests
1
36
4
18
3
3
14
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.1
12.0
6.1
3.7
3.3
5.5
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
296
111
47
34
40
706

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich