57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
1
36
18
4
4
3
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.1
6.1
12.0
3.3
1.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
303
47
111
40
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen