56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
36
18
4
5
3
3
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.1
6.1
12.0
2.2
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
296
47
111
63
40
34

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich