57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
36
18
4
14
5
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.1
6.1
3.3
5.5
2.8
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
303
47
40
700
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen