56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
36
18
5
3
3
1
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.1
6.1
2.2
3.3
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
296
47
63
40
40
64

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich