57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Anzahl der Tests
1
15
10
14
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#2
#8
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
6.0
13.4
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
229
109
153

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich