57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Anzahl der Tests
1
14
13
10
Optimale Position
#12
#8
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
13.4
6.2
6.0
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
225
104

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich