57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Destination HP
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
13
18
3
5
3
3
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.0
4.3
6.1
3.7
2.2
3.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2017
2025
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
35
123
47
34
63
40
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Destination HP
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich