57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6

Testprofil

Firestone
Destination HP
Goodyear
EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Anzahl der Tests
1
5
36
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.0
2.0
3.1
Neuester Test
2017
2018
2023
Verfügbare Größen
35
303

Nass

Nass
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Handling - nass
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
91%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Destination HP
97%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
56%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Destination HP
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
52%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4
52%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Destination HP
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich