Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Destination HP

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Anzahl der Tests

1

3

4

18

3

5

Optimale Position

#3

#2

#3

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

3.0

3.3

12.0

6.1

3.7

2.2

Neuester Test

2017

2026

2025

2024

2025

Verfügbare Größen

35

40

111

47

34

63

Nass

Firestone Destination HP

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Destination HP

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Destination HP

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Destination HP

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Handling - nass

Firestone Destination HP

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Destination HP

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Kosten

Firestone Destination HP

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Destination HP

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Komfort

Firestone Destination HP

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Destination HP

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Trocken

Firestone Destination HP

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Destination HP

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Nass

Kosten

Komfort

Trocken

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen