56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Destination HP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
1
3
3
3
3
Optimale Position
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.0
6.1
1.0
3.7
3.3
3.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2017
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
35
47
64
34
40
40
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Destination HP
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Destination HP
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich