57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Destination HP
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
14
4
1
Optimale Position
#3
#8
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.0
13.4
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2017
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
35
153
40
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Destination HP
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Destination HP
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Destination HP
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Destination HP
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Destination HP
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Destination HP
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Destination HP
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Destination HP
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Destination HP
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich