57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Destination HP gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Destination HP
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
14
18
15
4
Optimale Position
#3
#8
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.0
13.4
6.1
9.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2017
2026
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
35
153
47
226
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Destination HP
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Destination HP
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Destination HP
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Firestone Destination HP
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Destination HP
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Destination HP
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Destination HP
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Destination HP
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Destination HP
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Destination HP
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Destination HP
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Destination HP
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Destination HP
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich