58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Debica Presto gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Debica
Presto
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
2
4
18
13
4
4
Optimale Position
#4
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
10.0
3.3
6.1
4.3
3.8
3.3
Neuester Test
2016
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
29
40
47
123
36
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Debica Presto GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Michelin Primacy 4+ Falken e.Ziex GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.