57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: CST Medallion MD-A1 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

CST
Medallion MD-A1
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
2
18
1
3
Optimale Position
#10
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
21.5
6.1
1.0
3.7
Neuester Test
2019
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
264
47
64
34

Nass

Nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - quer
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Nassbremsen
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - längs
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Kreisbahn nass
CST Medallion MD-A1
24%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Trocken

Trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Handling - trocken
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Trockenbremsen
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rollwiderstand
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Komfort

Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich