Vergleich: Cooper Zeon CS8 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Nokian WetProof gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Obere-Mittelklasse

Cooper

Zeon CS8

VS

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Zeon CS8

e.Primacy

Roadhawk

WetProof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

14

4

21

14

3

Optimale Position

#9

#3

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

19.7

12.0

11.9

5.6

3.3

Neuester Test

2024

2025

2024

2023

2026

Verfügbare Größen

145

111

164

47

40

Nass

Cooper Zeon CS8

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Nokian WetProof

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - quer

Cooper Zeon CS8

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Nokian WetProof

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplaning - längs

Cooper Zeon CS8

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Nokian WetProof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Nassbremsen

Cooper Zeon CS8

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Nokian WetProof

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Handling - nass

Cooper Zeon CS8

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Nokian WetProof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kreisbahn nass

Cooper Zeon CS8

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Nokian WetProof

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Trocken

Cooper Zeon CS8

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Nokian WetProof

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trockenbremsen

Cooper Zeon CS8

59%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Nokian WetProof

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Handling - trocken

Cooper Zeon CS8

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Nokian WetProof

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Cooper Zeon CS8

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Nokian WetProof

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Cooper Zeon CS8

60%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Firestone Roadhawk

100%

Nokian WetProof

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Offroad

Cooper Zeon CS8

90%

Kosten

Cooper Zeon CS8

52%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Nokian WetProof

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rollwiderstand

Cooper Zeon CS8

49%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Nokian WetProof

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kilometerstand

Cooper Zeon CS8

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Nokian WetProof

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Preis-Wert

Cooper Zeon CS8

43%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Nokian WetProof

46%

Komfort

Cooper Zeon CS8

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Nokian WetProof

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

Cooper Zeon CS8

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Nokian WetProof

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Komfort

Cooper Zeon CS8

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Nokian WetProof

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Cooper Zeon CS8 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Nokian WetProof gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Zeon CS8

e.Primacy

Roadhawk

WetProof

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Offroad

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen