Vergleich: Continental VanContact Winter gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Premium

Continental

VanContact Winter

R14 – R17

VS

Obere-Mittelklasse

BFGoodrich

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

VanContact Winter

Advantage

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

2

14

4

3

Optimale Position

#1

#8

#3

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

1.0

13.4

12.0

3.3

Neuester Test

2019

2026

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

46

153

111

40

Trocken

Continental VanContact Winter

62%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trockenbremsen

Continental VanContact Winter

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Continental VanContact Winter

58%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Handling - trocken

Continental VanContact Winter

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Continental VanContact Winter

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Trockenleistung

Continental VanContact Winter

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Nass

Continental VanContact Winter

94%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nassbremsen

Continental VanContact Winter

94%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - quer

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kreisbahn nass

Continental VanContact Winter

92%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Aquaplaning - längs

Continental VanContact Winter

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Handling - nass

Continental VanContact Winter

95%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Nassleistung

Continental VanContact Winter

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Schnee

Continental VanContact Winter

85%

Komfort

Continental VanContact Winter

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

Continental VanContact Winter

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Innengeräusche

Continental VanContact Winter

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Kosten

Continental VanContact Winter

43%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kilometerstand

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Continental VanContact Winter

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Rollwiderstand

Continental VanContact Winter

43%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Eis

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Continental VanContact Winter gegen BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

VanContact Winter

Advantage

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Trocken

Nass

Schnee

Komfort

Kosten

Eis

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen