58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
3
4
4
18
1
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
1.3
3.3
12.0
6.1
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2024
2025
Verfügbare Größen
23
40
111
47
66

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Nassbremsen
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Handling - trocken
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Komfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.