57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
3
18
3
1
4
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
1.3
6.1
3.7
1.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
23
47
36
66
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - nass
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Nassbremsen
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Seitenführung
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Trocken
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Komfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kosten
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen