57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
28
3
18
4
1
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
2.3
3.7
6.1
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
67
36
47
40
66

Nass

Nass
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Seitenführung
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Handling - trocken
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Trockenbremsen
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rollwiderstand
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kilometerstand
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preis-Wert
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Komfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Außengeräusch
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich