57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Continental EcoContact 6 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Continental
EcoContact 6
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
5
13
18
6
4
Optimale Position
#7
#1
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
13.0
4.3
6.1
4.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2022
2025
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
679
123
47
146
40

Nass

Nass
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%

Trocken

Trocken
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Komfort

Komfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Komfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen