Vergleich: Continental EcoContact 6 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Premium

Continental

EcoContact 6

R13 – R23

VS

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0

R15 – R22

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Testprofil

EcoContact 6

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Anzahl der Tests

5

49

23

Optimale Position

#7

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

13.0

3.2

3.3

Neuester Test

2022

2024

2025

Verfügbare Größen

676

213

176

Nass

Continental EcoContact 6

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Kreisbahn nass

Continental EcoContact 6

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Handling - nass

Continental EcoContact 6

57%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Aquaplaning - quer

Continental EcoContact 6

40%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Nassbremsen

Continental EcoContact 6

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Aquaplaning - längs

Continental EcoContact 6

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Trocken

Continental EcoContact 6

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Trockenbremsen

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Handling - trocken

Continental EcoContact 6

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Continental EcoContact 6

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken

Continental EcoContact 6

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Trockenleistung

Continental EcoContact 6

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

Komfort

Continental EcoContact 6

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Außengeräusch

Continental EcoContact 6

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Komfort

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Innengeräusche

Continental EcoContact 6

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kosten

Continental EcoContact 6

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kraftstoffverbrauch

Continental EcoContact 6

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kilometerstand

Continental EcoContact 6

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Rollwiderstand

Continental EcoContact 6

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Preis-Wert

Continental EcoContact 6

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Continental EcoContact 6 gegen Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

EcoContact 6

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Komfort

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen