56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
21
4
3
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.8
11.9
12.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2019
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
35
164
111
40

Nass

Nass
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - nass
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kreisbahn nass
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Nassbremsen
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Seitenführung
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Handling - trocken
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Trockenbremsen
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Kosten

Kosten
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Rollwiderstand
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Preis-Wert
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
35%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%

Komfort

Komfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Innengeräusche
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich