56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-80 Evo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
3
10
3
Optimale Position
#6
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.7
6.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
48
104
40

Nass

Nass
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Nassbremsen
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Schnee

Schnee
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
92%

Trocken

Trocken
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - trocken
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Komfort

Komfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Kosten

Kosten
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich