57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Bridgestone Blizzak 6 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
18
24
10
4
Optimale Position
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
3.6
6.1
2.7
6.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2025
2024
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
194
47
302
109
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kreisbahn nass
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Nassfahrverhalten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Seitenführung
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Schnee
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Schneetraktion
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Bremsen auf Schnee
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Schnee Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Schnee Slalom
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Schneeleistung
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Trocken
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Trockenleistung
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kosten
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preis-Wert
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Komfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Innengeräusche
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Offroad
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Eis
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
23%

Tread pattern comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen