57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

BFGoodrich AdvantageObere-Mittelklasse
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Obere-Mittelklasse
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 S

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
14
10
3
3
Optimale Position
#8
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
6.0
3.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
104
60
40

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Nassleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Trockenleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich