56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
14
3
24
26
Optimale Position
#8
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
3.3
2.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
40
302
66

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Seitenführung
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Nassleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
45%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Trockenleistung
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Trocken Lenkverhalten
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Innengeräusche
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Preis-Wert
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich