57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Firestone Multiseason 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
14
13
18
3
5
Optimale Position
#8
#6
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
10.9
6.1
3.7
2.8
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
153
61
47
36
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Seitenführung
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Spurwechselsicherheit - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Preis-Wert
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen