57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage gegen Cooper Zeon CS8 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Cooper
Zeon CS8
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
14
14
6
4
5
Optimale Position
#8
#9
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
13.4
19.7
4.7
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2026
2024
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
153
147
146
40
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Cooper Zeon CS8
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Kilometerstand
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Cooper Zeon CS8
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen