56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: BFGoodrich Advantage SUV gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

BFGoodrich
Advantage SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
2
10
6
Optimale Position
#5
#2
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
6.5
6.0
4.7
Neuester Test
2021
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
25
104
146

Nass

Nass
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Nassbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Handling - nass
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kreisbahn nass
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%

Offroad

Offroad
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
78%

Komfort

Komfort
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Trocken

Trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Handling - trocken
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Kosten

Kosten
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rollwiderstand
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich