57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: BF Goodrich g-Grip gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
6
13
3
3
Optimale Position
#6
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
19.3
4.3
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2019
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
2
123
40
34

Nass

Nass
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Kreisbahn nass
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Handling - nass
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - quer
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - längs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Kosten

Kosten
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rollwiderstand
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Trocken

Trocken
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Handling - trocken
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Komfort

Komfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich