57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: BF Goodrich g-Grip gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

BF Goodrich g-GripObere-Mittelklasse
BFBF

Goodrich g-Grip

R14 – R15
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
6
3
4
28
Optimale Position
#6
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
19.3
3.7
3.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2019
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
4
36
40
67

Nass

Nass
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - nass
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - längs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Kreisbahn nass
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Kosten

Kosten
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preis-Wert
BF Goodrich g-Grip
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rollwiderstand
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Trocken

Trocken
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - trocken
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Komfort

Komfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Reifen für ElektroautosBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Auch vergleichen

BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Cooper CS7BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Falken Sincera SN110BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3BF Goodrich g-Grip vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.ZiexFalken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXTFalken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenKumhoNokianNexenVredesteinContinentalGTMaxxis

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich