57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: BF Goodrich Advantage 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

BF
Goodrich Advantage 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
3
3
4
18
4
Optimale Position
#5
#1
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
14.3
1.3
12.0
6.1
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2026
2025
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
292
23
111
47
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rollwiderstand
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Komfort
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Außengeräusch
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen