Vergleich: Apollo Aspire XP gegen Vredestein Ultrac+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Apollo

Aspire XP

R16 – R19

VS

Premium

Vredestein

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Aspire XP

Ultrac+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Anzahl der Tests

9

3

4

3

Optimale Position

#4

#10

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

8.6

10.7

3.3

3.7

Neuester Test

2020

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

51

79

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass

Apollo Aspire XP

74%

Vredestein Ultrac+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - quer

Apollo Aspire XP

75%

Vredestein Ultrac+

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - längs

Apollo Aspire XP

81%

Vredestein Ultrac+

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Nassbremsen

Apollo Aspire XP

69%

Vredestein Ultrac+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Kreisbahn nass

Apollo Aspire XP

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Handling - nass

Apollo Aspire XP

77%

Vredestein Ultrac+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Trocken

Apollo Aspire XP

82%

Vredestein Ultrac+

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Trockenbremsen

Apollo Aspire XP

85%

Vredestein Ultrac+

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Handling - trocken

Apollo Aspire XP

84%

Vredestein Ultrac+

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Kosten

Apollo Aspire XP

71%

Vredestein Ultrac+

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rollwiderstand

Apollo Aspire XP

73%

Vredestein Ultrac+

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Kilometerstand

Apollo Aspire XP

67%

Vredestein Ultrac+

58%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Komfort

Apollo Aspire XP

88%

Vredestein Ultrac+

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Außengeräusch

Apollo Aspire XP

88%

Vredestein Ultrac+

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Best tyres for evs Beste Trockenhandling reifen Beste Regenreifen Reifen mit bestem Handling Die Leisesten reifen Die günstigsten reifen Beste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Auch vergleichen

Apollo Aspire XP vs Giti Gitisport S2

Apollo Aspire XP vs Avon ZV7

Apollo Aspire XP vs Viking Protech NewGen

Apollo Aspire XP vs Vredestein ULTRAC+

Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Viking Protech NewGen

Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Avon ZV7

Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Vredestein Ultrac+ vs Michelin Primacy 5

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Vergleich: Apollo Aspire XP gegen Vredestein Ultrac+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Aspire XP

Ultrac+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Testprofil

Abmessungen und Preise

Rankings entdecken

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

Auch vergleichen

Nach Marke durchsuchen

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen