57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Apollo Aspire XP gegen Vredestein Ultrac+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Apollo
Aspire XP
Vredestein
Ultrac+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
9
3
4
Optimale Position
#4
#10
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
8.6
10.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2020
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
51
79
40

Nass

Nass
Apollo Aspire XP
74%
Vredestein Ultrac+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - quer
Apollo Aspire XP
75%
Vredestein Ultrac+
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - längs
Apollo Aspire XP
81%
Vredestein Ultrac+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Nassbremsen
Apollo Aspire XP
69%
Vredestein Ultrac+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Apollo Aspire XP
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Handling - nass
Apollo Aspire XP
77%
Vredestein Ultrac+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Trocken

Trocken
Apollo Aspire XP
82%
Vredestein Ultrac+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Apollo Aspire XP
85%
Vredestein Ultrac+
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Handling - trocken
Apollo Aspire XP
84%
Vredestein Ultrac+
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Kosten

Kosten
Apollo Aspire XP
71%
Vredestein Ultrac+
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Apollo Aspire XP
73%
Vredestein Ultrac+
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Apollo Aspire XP
67%
Vredestein Ultrac+
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Apollo Aspire XP
88%
Vredestein Ultrac+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Apollo Aspire XP
88%
Vredestein Ultrac+
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Komfort
Apollo Aspire XP
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich