Vergleich: Apollo Aspire XP gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Budget

Apollo

Aspire XP

R16 – R19

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Auch vergleichen mit

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Testprofil

Aspire XP

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance+

Anzahl der Tests

9

3

1

3

23

Optimale Position

#4

#2

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

8.6

3.3

1.0

3.7

3.3

Neuester Test

2020

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

51

40

64

34

176

Nass

Apollo Aspire XP

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Aquaplaning - quer

Apollo Aspire XP

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Aquaplaning - längs

Apollo Aspire XP

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Nassbremsen

Apollo Aspire XP

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kreisbahn nass

Apollo Aspire XP

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Handling - nass

Apollo Aspire XP

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Trocken

Apollo Aspire XP

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Trockenbremsen

Apollo Aspire XP

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Handling - trocken

Apollo Aspire XP

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Trocken Lenkverhalten

Apollo Aspire XP

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Kosten

Apollo Aspire XP

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rollwiderstand

Apollo Aspire XP

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kilometerstand

Apollo Aspire XP

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Preis-Wert

Apollo Aspire XP

71%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Komfort

Apollo Aspire XP

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Außengeräusch

Apollo Aspire XP

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Komfort

Apollo Aspire XP

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Apollo Aspire XP gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Aspire XP

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance+

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen