59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Mitas E-09 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental SportContact 7 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Mitas
E-09
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
SportContact 7
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
18
4
4
17
7
Optimale Position
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
6.1
3.3
3.3
1.3
2.3
Neuester Test
2024
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
8
47
40
40
124
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Nassbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Handling - nass
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental SportContact 7
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Rollwiderstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kilometerstand
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Trockenbremsen
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Handling - trocken
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental SportContact 7
93%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Außengeräusch
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental SportContact 7
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Komfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Continental SportContact 7
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Mitas E-09 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Continental SportContact 7 Hankook Ventus Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.