59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Michelin Agilis Camping gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Michelin
Agilis Camping
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
4
4
18
4
3
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
3.3
12.0
6.1
3.8
1.3
Neuester Test
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
7
40
111
47
36
23

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Nassbremsen
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - quer
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Handling - nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Kreisbahn nass
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Außengeräusch
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Komfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Handling - trocken
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rollwiderstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Kilometerstand
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Michelin Agilis Camping GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Michelin e.Primacy Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Falken e.Ziex Continental UltraContact NXT %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.