59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
10
16
4
30
4
Optimale Position
#2
#3
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
6.0
5.5
3.8
2.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2026
2023
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
109
153
36
68
40

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - längs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Aquaplaning - quer
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Nassbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Handling - nass
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Komfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Innengeräusche
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Trockenbremsen
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Handling - trocken
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rollwiderstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kilometerstand
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Preis-Wert
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Kumho Ecsta HS52 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Falken e.Ziex Continental PremiumContact 7 GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.