59 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo gegen Firestone Roadhawk gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Cargo
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
21
4
4
18
7
Optimale Position
#2
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
2.0
11.9
12.0
3.3
6.1
2.3
Neuester Test
2019
2024
2025
2026
2024
2026
Verfügbare Größen
43
165
111
40
47
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Handling - nass
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Offroad
Vertrauensniveau
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Rollwiderstand
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Preis-Wert
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Trockenbremsen
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Handling - trocken
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Komfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Dimension Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Firestone Roadhawk Michelin e.Primacy GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Hankook Ventus Evo %
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16
205/55 R16

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.